Sunday, August 19, 2007

Live Blogging From the Debate


Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 519

Coming to you live from the press filing center at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa for coverage of this morning's Democratic Presidential Debate.

9:23 - that's it for the debate. On to the spin room!

9:19 - question on turning points in candidate's life. Kucinich says it was living in a car as a child. Obama says it was going from high school to college. Biden says involvement in civil rights movement was pivotal. Richardson says his marriage was decisive moment in his life, then 9/11. Gravel says pivotal moment came when he realized that the people are the central power of government. Edwards says it was when he found his father watching educational TV to better himself. Dodd says the Peace Corps was pivotal. Clinton says the women's movement was crucial for her.

9:15 - question on interest rate reductions for banks. Clinton says help is needed for families in foreclosure. Dodd says more market liquidity is needed. Edwards echoes Clinton on foreclosures. Gravel is Gravel. Richardson says problem is also with mortgage lenders. Biden says there's as much trouble in mortgage lending as there was in savings and loans in the 1980s. Obama says more liquidity is needed, but also more accountability. Kucinich says loan practices need to be revamped across the board.

9:07 - question on performance-based pay for teachers. Dodd says he would devote more resources, including pay, for teachers who volunteer to go into troubled schools. Obama says teachers should be given buy-in on how and when incentives are given for performance. Clinton supports incentives school-wide, but not from one teacher to another. Richardson says he would scrap No Child Left Behind. Gravel launches tirade on how poor US education system is, then stumbles badly and draws derisive laughter. Time for him to go, I think.

9:00 - back from commercial. Email question on when candidates have been less than truthful. Gravel says other candidates are all liars and hypocrites. Biden says he's always spoken his mind in public, often too much (big laughs in the press room). Kucinich says he's always truthful. Obama talks about climate change and sacrifice. Edwards goes back to his Iraq vote and apology, and how conflicted he felt about authorizing the war. Clinton says she regrets giving President Bush authority to go to war in Iraq, ad wouldn't vote that way again, but thought at the time she truthfully thought she was making the right vote. Richardson says he makes about one mistake a week, and he's not the scripted candidate, but he gets the job done. Dodd says he wishes he'd done more to defeat the Military Commissions Act last year.

8:49 - question on support for small farms and farmers. Dodd says tougher anti-trust enforcement is needed. Edwards says trade policy on agriculture has failed - good for large corporations and bad for American workers. Clinton agrees with Edwards, says we need more focus on family farms, should maximize our advantages as an exporter of agricultural products to obtain advantages for America. Obama says we should limit subsidies for large agribusiness companies. Richardson has a chance to answer, but can't get it in before a commercial.

8:43 - email question about whether the candidates believe in a personal God and prayer. Hillary believes in prayer. So does Dodd. Edwards says he prays every day. Gravel believes in love. Richardson says he's Catholic and prays, but that faith should be a personal matter, not imposed on others. Biden also says pro-prayer things. Obama believes in the power of prayer. Kucinich quotes Bible verses, says faith must be augmented by good works.

I know it's Sunday morning in the Heartland, but I can't believe how much debate time was consumed on this question.

8:41 - Kucinich again goes after his fellow Democrats for authorizing and funding the war. He must think that this tactic will work for him, but the results don't bear him out so far. Press room starts laughing towards the end of his statement.

8:38 - Obama says there are only bad options and worse options on getting out of Iraq. Compares senators who voted to authorize going to war in Iraq with Rumsfeld and Cheney. Says partition of Iraq needs to originate with the Iraqis, not the US.

8:37 - Biden cites the Balkans as an example of how his approach can work. Says combat troops will need to stay to protect US civilians.

8:35 - Richardson takes the initiative and asks question directly to Biden and Clinton about how many residual troops should be left in Iraq after combat forces are withdrawn. Biden answers by detailing his four point plan for Iraq.

8:34 - Edwards says it would take 9 or 10 months to get troops out of Iraq, but any Democratic president will end the war, in contrast to the GOP field, which he characterizes as "George Bush on steroids."

8:33 - Gravel says he disagrees with everybody on Iraq. Much chuckling in the press room.

8:30 - Clinton emphasizes no military solution, says Iraqis are too busy jockeying for power to deliver a political solution. Getting out of Iraq will be complicated, says military planners tend to agree with Biden over Richardson. Tactical error: speaking as arbiter between two of her opponents.

8:27 - Biden gets free media for his latest commercial on Iraq. Richardson says get all troops out of Iraq by the end of the year is the best policy. Biden responds that how we leave Iraq will influence American interest for a generation, asks how the 5,000 US civilians in the green zone would be protected with all troops gone.

8:25 - Kucinich dodges the question of whether special interest influence in politics by saying he's being excluded from the debate, then launches into single-payer health care.

8:24 - Dodd also backs public financing.

8:23 - Clinton comes out for public financing of elections as the answer to the influence of money in politics. Edwards says "take these people on and beat them" is the way to get special interest influence out of politics.

8:20 - Clinton turns the "high negatives/Karl Rove" question around by saying that Rove doesn't like her is that she knows how to beat Republicans. She hit that one out of the park.

8:19 - Edwards goes for the change card, too, and reintroduces the populist rhetoric of the past week.

8:16 - moderator plays sound clip of Karl Rove saying Clinton can't be elected. Obama waives it away. Says country's problems are bipartisan, needs to be solved by changing politics in Washington, and again waives away question on Clinton's part in bad politics in Washington.

8:15 -Richardson disavows first use of nuclear weapons, emphasizes diplomacy, proposes a treaty on fissionable material.

8:14 - Mike Gravel launches into an indictment of US policy on Iran.

8:11 - Edwards answers the Pakistan question with "What happened to hope and optimism?," going right at Obama. Says he wouldn't talk in hypotheticals about use of nuclear weapons, but says he would lead an effort to eliminate all nuclear weapons world-wide.

8:10 - now its Cinton's chance to draw sharp differences on foreign policy, and again it's a Clinton - Obama argument.

8:07: Obama finally gets his turn. Starts by softening the differences on foreign policy, then returns to the Pakistan question to go at Clinton specifically. Look for this to happen many times this morning: Obama focusing on Clinton and bypassing other candidates.

8:05- Richardson jumps in saying that he's the ideal balance of change and experience, but dodges the question about whether he thinks Obama is ready to be president.

8:03 - same question to Biden now. "We have no Pakistan policy, we have a Musharraf policy." Doesn't back down from previous statements re: Obama.

8:02 - same question to Dodd. Obama doesn't look happy about this line of questioning.

8:01 - first question deals with experience, with particular reference to Obama and Clinton, a ricochet off of the foreign policy debate mentioned earlier. Clinton handles the question well, sticking to her own qualifications and mostly passing on the chance to rake Obama over the coals.

8:00 - candidates are on the stage, and the first word goes to...George Stephanopoulous.

7:30 - What's at Stake
With less than six months (anybody want to start a pool on what the exact date will end up being?) until the Iowa Caucus, the stakes for the candidates in this debate are enormous. This will be the first Iowa "close up," of the 2008 race, and all the work the various campaigns have done to define themselves and their opponents will be put to the test. Some things to watch:
Bill Richardson - his "Presidential Job Interview" ads have been well received, giving him a bump in the polls here and in New Hampshire, but he's been unimpressive in every debate thus far and his momentum has stalled as a result. Turning around his debate performance this morning is crucial for Richardson, and could make the difference between top tier and also ran.

  • Barack Obama - it is unusual for front runners to outline their foreign policy plans in detail during the campaign, and Obama's speech earlier this month provides a good illustration of why this is true. After stating he would launch military attacks inside Pakistan whether or not the government of that country consented, Obama has been smacked around from all sides. But he's often given as good as he's got, and the fight has served as a vehicle to sharpen differences between Obama and the other candidates. The question for this morning is whether this dynamic will continue to exert itself during this debate, and, if it does, how far Obama can wade into that fight without tarnishing his images as a different kind of candidate.
  • Hillary Clinton - she's turned in solid performances in every debate thus far, and another this morning could really help her in Iowa, as well as nationally. The usual challenge prevails for Clinton: showing steel and heart in equal measure.
  • John Edwards - Edwards continues to experiment with what tone will serve him best during the campaign. This past week has been all about populism during his just-concluded bus tour across the state, so look for that to continue this morning.
  • Biden and Dodd - with Labor Day looming, both candidates must be feeling desperate for a break out moment this morning, and that could lead to some surprises during the debate.

7:25 - there's a huge cheering section across University Avenue from the debate. Lots of signs and some really loud cheering. I'm sure that's going over well in the neighborhood...

7:21 - I've been credentialed to cover both the debate and the post-debate spin, so we'll be going wall-to-wall this morning. Interestingly, no media will be allowed inside the debate hall this morning, other than pool photographers, so we're relegated to a building a hundred yards or so from the action. But the spin room should be interesting...

7:07 - press center is still pretty empty. Someone remind me why it is these debates are being held early on Sunday morning? *mumble and sigh*



Digg!

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Younger and Wiser

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 523

As Santayana himself might have put it in this instance, those who forget history are doomed to become it. This speaks for itself:



Open invitation to Vice President Cheney: care to go on YouTube to debate yourself?



Digg!

Saturday, August 11, 2007

GOP Straw Poll

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 527

As expected, Mitt Romney bought a win in the doesn't-mean-a-thing-pay-to-play Iowa GOP straw poll.

In theory, the field consisted of eleven candidates, but three - John McCain, Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson - didn't even bother campaigning, adding to the yawn factor.

But I do find one thing worth noting: the Ron Paul "phenomenon" is, as I have long suspected, a technically engineered March of the Netbots. Paul garnered just 1,305 votes out of more than 14,000 cast; his internet "support" is the electoral equivalent of Monopoly money. He'll need to come up with another gimmick if he wants to win something more than bragging rights on YouTube.

For full coverage, check out Chase Martyn's reliably excellent work over at Iowa Independent.



Digg!

Thursday, August 9, 2007

Touché

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 529

This hit my in box from the Dodd campaign today and is just too interesting not to post on:

MANCHESTER, NH -- In response to criticism of his recent foreign policy pronouncements, Senator Obama has pointed to his opposition to the Iraq war while he was a State Senator from Illinois. However, he has neglected to mention that he said that he did not know what he would have done if he were in the U.S. Senate at the time of the vote to authorize the war.

"In a recent interview, he declined to criticize Senators Kerry and Edwards for voting to authorize the war, although he said he would not have done the same based on the information he had at the time. 'But, I'm not privy to Senate intelligence reports,' Mr. Obama said. 'What would I have done? I don't know. What I know is that from my vantage point the case was not made.'" [New York Times, 7/26/04]


"Senator Obama's position as a state senator rings hollow in light of the fact that he himself says he doesn't know how he would have voted as a U.S. Senator," said Chris Dodd. "It's going to take leadership in the U.S. Senate to end the war in Iraq. That's why I led the fight for a firm deadline and clearly and unequivocally stated my opposition to supplemental funding for George Bush's failed policy - something that can't be said of all the candidates."


Someone in Dodd's oppo research team has certainly been busy, and they may have struck gold with this. This goes right at one of Obama's principal claims to leadership: he knows better than the other candidates on Iraq, and, by implication, foreign policy generally. It also hits Obama's credibility. As such, it's too strong a hit to let go unanswered by Obama's campaign. It will be interesting to see the response.




Digg!

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Off Line This Week

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 531

Dear Readers,

Due to some family stuff, I won't be posting this week. I had planned coverage on some really interesting policy work the candidates have been producing lately, but that will have to wait.

I plan on being back in publication the week of August 13. In the meantime, please click through any of the linked sites off to the side for great coverage of the week's political news.

Thanks, and see you next week.

Sunday, August 5, 2007

Regarding Comments

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 534

My esteemed fellow blogger desmoinesdem over at Bleeding Heartland has put up an interesting post regarding political versus non-political blogs, and was kind enough to mention iPol in the course or discussing how and why some blogs moderate comments.

I left a comment on that post, but thought it would be as well to include it in its own right here, for the benefit of readers who may have wondered what is the iPol editorial policy regarding comments.

Other than spam (i.e., "click this link for the truth about Barak Obama!"), the only occasion upon which I will not post a comment submitted on iPol is when the comment is a personal attack against another person, like another reader or fellow blogger. This has happened only twice, I'm happy to say.

Beyond that, I've never screened out negative comments about myself or something I've posted - take a look at the comments related to my interview with Dennis Kucinich for a good, healthy sample of comments who (to put it mildly) disagreed with me.

Where I feel commentors have, in my opinion, missed the point, or simply gotten it wrong, I will respond with a counterpoint, but, again, that's all done in the open, where readers can see the comments and judge for themselves.

I feel this approach strikes the best overall balance between preserving healthy debate and exchange of views, while keeping the troll factor to a minimum.

Disagree? Feel free to...well... leave a comment!




Digg!

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Edwards Plans Iowa Bus Tour

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 539

After pedaling through part of the state during last week's RAGBRAI, John Edwards is trading in his bike for a bus and planning a 30-county campaign swing, to take place August 13 - 19.

Starting and ending in Des Moines, Edwards' bus tour will be making the following stops:

MONDAY, AUGUST 13, 2007
Des Moines
Perry
Jefferson
Carroll
Denison
Onawa

TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 2007
Sioux City
Ida Grove
Rockwell City
Pocahontas
Clarion
Clear Lake

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 15, 2007
Manly
Osage
Charles City
Waterloo
Waverly

THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 2007
Grundy Center
Ames
Des Moines
Oskaloosa
Ottumwa

FRIDAY, AUGUST 17, 2007
Centerville
Bloomfield
Keokuk
Burlington
Wapello
Iowa City

SATURDAY, AUGUST 18, 2007
Dubuque
Davenport
Cedar Rapids

SUNDAY, AUGUST 19, 2007
Des Moines

After a similar jaunt by Chris Dodd a month ago, during which singer/songwriter Paul Simon came along, I wonder if Edwards' will be bringing along any musical accompaniment of his own? Couldn't hurt!




Digg!

Monday, July 30, 2007

The Mailbag, Vol. 2

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 540

This is a post on some things sent over the transom that caught my eye during the past week, but didn't otherwise make for posts in and of themselves.

YouTube Ripple

No, not the latest flavor at Ben & Jerry's; I'm talking about how campaigns are starting to riff on the CNN/YouTube debate. First, the Richardson campaign kicked off it's own initiative to take questions from voters via video, email or on-line form. In an email announcing what its calling "Ask Bill," Richardson's campaign described it as follows:

"We're going to upend the status quo and skip the media middleman. Direct questions, direct answers. That is the strategy we've been using in living rooms and meeting rooms across the country -- and our rising poll numbers show it's working.

Want to know more about my experience negotiating with the world's toughest dictators? You won't get that answer on the CNN debate -- but you will from "Ask Bill." Want to know my favorite flavor of ice cream? I'll take that question too. ¿Quiere saber cómo aumentaré el sueldo de maestros? Pregúnteme ahora- en inglés o en español- y contestaré en cualquiera."


A few days later, John Kerry weighed in with his own twist on the theme, launching the "Roadblock Republican Radio Contest." An email from Kerry's Senate reelection campaign gave the following details:

"Republicans are feeling the pressure for change on Iraq. But I'm not a patient person. Especially when the lives of our troops are at stake. I refuse to wait around for the Republicans to move without giving them a little more pushing.

Quite simply, we want to take an unusual step - and we want to do it early. I think we need to run radio ads in the states of the Roadblock Republicans, making it crystal clear that they don't deserve to be reelected because of their continued support for the Bush Doctrine of escalation without end. We need to turn up the heat even higher.

It's the pressure of activists and the voice of the people that have gotten us this far in the Iraq debate, not the cookie-cutter ads and thirty second soundbites of Madison Avenue media firms.

So we decided, why don't we let you speak in this radio campaign? If user generated content can change presidential debates, I know it can help change the next election on the most pivotal of issues.

That's why we're running a contest. We want you to send in a script for a 30 second radio spot (that's about 65 words long), we'll whittle it down some to the top 20, and then we'll open up the voting to everyone. The winner that's chosen by the people will be what we air in the states. And we'll fundraise for the airing of that spot, with each of you able to choose with your contribution where you think we should run the ad. No political professionals making the spot, or choosing where to run it. It's all done by you."


All this is a direct result of the buzz from this week's voter-submitted questions in the CNN/YouTube debate. Look for more of this in the coming weeks.

And While You're Asking Richardson...

Chris Dodd's communications director, Hari Savugan, sent me an email last week with a subject line of "FYI - Richardson Admits Flip-Flop on Guns." The email contrasts Richardson's statements during his widely-panned May 27, 2007 appearance on Meet the Press with a story that ran in the Albuquerque Journal July 27. What it boils down to is that, in the wake of the Virginia Tech tragedy earlier this year, Bill Richardson reversed his position on a loophole in current law that allows buyers at gun shows to purchase firearms without passing a background check (Richardson supported the exemption before, and now does not). When I asked how Richardson's current stance on this issue compares to Dodd's, Savugan replied, "Chris Dodd has consitently [sic] favored instant background checks and closing the gun show loophole, whether he's running in a Democratic primary or not." So, while Dodd and Richardson now hold the same position on this issue, Dodd's camp faults Richardson for the switch.

The real story here, to my mind, is not the position on guns, although I think Richardson did the right and responsible thing in switching his position; the switch appears to have been driven by events - not polls, but events - and changing one's views in response to real-world developments is far more virtue than vice (think about the last 4+ years of "staying the course" for perhaps the best lesson here). In my view, Bill Richardson was wrong before, and now he's come down on the right side of this issue. So I'm not really troubled by the flip-flop, if that's what this was.

Rather, I think the real story is that, with a little less than 6 months to go before the caucuses, the sixth-place candidate (Dodd) is taking this kind of shot at the fourth-place candidate (Richardson), rather than one of the top three. As we move into August, the gloves are starting to come off. There's no doubt that Chris Dodd's best hope - perhaps his only hope - of moving up from the bottom of the field is that one or more candidates above him stumbles; but that being the case, I would have thought he would have aimed higher, at Clinton or Obama. Last week would have been a particularly opportune moment for doing so, with the top two contenders embroiled in a war of words between themselves over foreign policy; imagine, then, the impact of a solid shot from Dodd on a domestic issue would have had in opening a second front against the most prominent rivals in the Democratic race. That really might have helped Dodd. As it was, I think his campaign went for the forward pass and wound up not moving the ball at all.

The Candidate Formerly Known as Kucinich

Finally tonight, news from Planet Kucinich. The Kucinich campaign sent around an email on July 22 from campaign manager Make Klein (who took over from David Bright last month), announcing that Kucinich's initial website at http://www.kucinich.us had been scrapped in favor of http://action.dennis4president.com. But neither the hiring of Klein as campaign manager, nor the retooling of Kucinich's website could match the breathtaking impact of the news Klein flashed to supporters in an email dated July 27:
"Last week, Dennis Kucinich launched his presidential campaign with house parties from coast-to-coast, a ground-breaking new website and a historic campaign to change government policy by sending text messages."


Learning that Kucinich had launched his presidential campaign only the previous week must have come as something of a shock to supporters who had been laboring under the misapprehension that the candidate who's campaign now refers to by his first name, rather than his last, had declared himself a candidate back on December 12, 2006 ("I am announcing my candidacy for President of the United States" was the exact quote from the speech - not much ambiguity there, I would have thought). But, now that Mark Klein has declared that the campaign has finally begun, I think we can expect to see signs that the kidding around from Dennis has come to an end. Really. Big things will happen. Naysayers will come crawling to Cleveland for forgiveness. Front-runners will lay down and quit the race. The clouds will part, and angels weep in gratitude at the advent of global justice now.

Or not.



Digg!

Thursday, July 26, 2007

It's All Local

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 543

Its been said that all politics are local. Judging by this clip up on the Washington Post's website today, this is particularly true if you eat at the diner down the street from my house.



Digg!

Dodd Rolls Out Health Care Plan, Looks to Private Sector for Universal Coverage

Days Until Bush Leaves Office = 543

Senator and presidential candidate Chris Dodd rolled out his health care proposal today at a "kitchen table" campaign stop in Marion, Iowa.

Details of the plan, as released by the Dodd campaign, are:

  • Universal HealthMart. The Dodd plan will create a health insurance marketplace called the Universal HealthMart that is based on, and parallel to, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan (FEHBP). Individuals and businesses will pay for coverage within Universal HealthMart based on their ability to pay. If a person or business is unable to pay for insurance, the government will subsidize their premium share on a sliding scale based on income. Universal HealthMart will offer a variety of comprehensive plans and entitle every American to the same benefits and types of plans as Members of Congress.
  • Universal Affordable Coverage. Under the Dodd plan, coverage will flow automatically to all Americans regardless of their employment status, health status or economic means. Coverage will follow people, not their jobs. Enrollment will be automatic unless individuals and employees choose to have insurance outside Universal HealthMart. Coverage will be phased in over four years. As more and more Americans participate, Universal HealthMart will gain increasing leverage to negotiate premiums and lower costs. Price discrimination based on condition will be eliminated.
  • Better Care for Kids: Under the Dodd Plan, every child in America will have guaranteed health insurance equivalent to the health coverage Members of Congress have for their children. All children will have access to preventive health screenings including vision, hearing, autism, and other neurological disorders.
  • Portability. Health coverage will be portable as it follows individuals, not jobs. Regardless of where people live, they will have access to and be able to maintain their Universal HealthMart insurance. Universal HealthMart health care will carry across jobs as long as employers participate in the system.
  • Automatic Coverage. Coverage will occur through direct enrollment or automatically when people file their tax returns, complete W-4 forms, or show up for health care with a provider. Through the process of automatic coverage and enrollment, universal coverage will be guaranteed.
  • Choice. Every American will be guaranteed a number of comprehensive health coverage options in the Universal HealthMart. Individuals will gain the ability to choose for themselves and their families the kind of health plan they want. The choice no longer needs to be in the hands of employers whose primary interest may be controlling costs.
  • Focus on Prevention. The Dodd plan will focus on chronic disease management and preventive measures. People who make personal choices to improve their health through smoking cessation, weight loss, and exercise will have access to plan rewards and incentives. Chronic illness will be prevented and treated through an integrated system of chronic disease management modeled after the system used by the Veterans Administration and outstanding private delivery systems. Within Universal HealthMart, this care model will employ the most innovative methods of care coordination including interoperable health information technology and coordination between providers and levels of care.
  • Lower Costs for Employers. In addition to realizing the benefits of reduced premiums brought on by the bargaining power of Universal HealthMart, employers who participate in Universal HealthMart will no longer be required to negotiate insurance premiums or shoulder the costly task of administering health plans. Employers and their employees will have guaranteed access to a variety of plans and will contribute based on their ability to pay. Better and guaranteed coverage of employees will result in better health, less absenteeism, and higher productivity.
  • The Power of Technology. The Dodd plan will lower administrative costs and eliminate inefficiency by investing in technology and data collection for better care. Better use of interoperable health information technology will reduce administrative costs, improve quality, and enhance coordination of care. Widespread use of information technology will provide the mechanisms for monitoring and improving quality. In addition to improving quality and enhancing the coordination of care, incentives for using technology will also result in further cost savings and lower premiums.
  • Affordability. Savings in better care and better efficiencies will help finance new coverage. Premiums will be driven down for employers and employees as negotiators bargain from strength on behalf of a large pool of people and businesses. In exchange for a larger market and a lot more customers, most of whom are pretty healthy, the insurance industry will be forced to end price and coverage discrimination against people who need medical care.
  • Funding. Universal coverage will not require a new tax. Instead, much of the plan can be paid for by eliminating the existing inefficiencies in the system. Universal HealthMart will be financed primarily by employer and individual premiums and contributions. Other revenue streams such as those that would result from ending the war in Iraq will be identified for transition costs.
  • Easy to Accomplish. The Universal HealthMart model, the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Plan, already operates in every county in the country.
  • Action now. Universal coverage is an important priority for our productivity, our economic growth and the lives and health of our people. Within two years of enactment the Dodd plan will phase in universal coverage by age group based on current levels of insurance and health need. Within two years of enactment, all children, young adults to age 29, and adults age 55-64 will have health insurance. In the following two years, all remaining adults age 30-54 will be enrolled.
  • Existing Public Insurance. Under the Dodd plan, Medicare remains intact but will be given power to negotiate with pharmaceuticals on the cost of prescription drugs. Medicaid will also remain intact. All people under 100% of poverty will be eligible for Medicaid with adjustments in the federal match to hold states harmless.



Addtional details are available on Chris Dodd's website.

In a conference with the media after the announcement, Dodd commended John Edwards and Barack Obama for introducing their own proposals to achieve universal health care coverage, but faulted the Obama plan for lacking a clear path to coverage for all, and said Edwards' proposals fell short in envisioning regional, rather than national coverage plans, and also in requiring a tax increase. Senator Dodd maintains that his plan, which he says would cost $50 - $70 billion over the four years required to implement it, could be paid for without increasing taxes, mainly by using money that's currently being spent on the Iraq war.

My initial impression is that Dodd's plan is a very, very conservative approach that relies on the existing health insurance market to bridge gaps primarily created by that very same system. The Universal Healthmart Dodd proposes seems little more than the type of federal buying pool long discussed as a means of reducing insurance premiums and pharmaceutical costs. There's nothing here that would set the insurance industry or American Medical Association trembling in their shoes, certainly. Senator Doodd is right when he identifies health care as an issue of deep concern to Americans, but I suspect many who look at his proposals will wonder how you fix the existing system while at the same time going out of your way not to rock the boat.




Digg!

 
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites